Pop-up shows are abundant these days and small venues everywhere use their extra spaces to provide artists with a place to show work. These shows usually last only a few days but sometimes there are nice surprises to be found. Resonant City happened to come across Crystal Gregory’s weekend-long installation last month in Brooklyn at Treasure Island Studios. Her installation, 1
For artists, having the space to display work allows for a greater understanding of the work’s qualities that would otherwise be impossible to grasp. With sculpture and installation work, access to space is doubly important. Space also gives the artist the ability to experiment and to discover the right relationships and arrangements between objects. As Gregory’s work directly addresses a zone of convergence between objects and their surroundings, she was able to use this temporary space effectively.
The assembled works are clustered into three areas of the small room with just enough space to move around the objects. Prominently displayed in the middle of the room are six cast concrete rings hanging from orange twine in an intricate, knotted pattern; some are directly suspended, while others lie on the floor. Alluding to this entanglement, the piece is titled How Many of Those Yoked Together Have ever Seen Oxen? (a line from the Gertrude Stein’s novel, Ida).
m is a textured grey concrete casting of the corner itself, floated on a pile of handmade 1 inch glass cubes with a background of two blue paintings. Above this is an architectonic structure, The Presence of Absence, composed of welded flat steel strips buffed to a dull grey; it is approximately three feet long and forms a lattice of connectivity between two walls. It also casts a faint shadow on the white wall behind it adding an illusory sense of depth to that corner.
Cascading from the room’s opposite corner is a green textile with an eye-catching, bright blue stripe. The top edge is tightly woven while it gets progressively more frayed and then completely unravels as it trails along the ground. Next to this wall piece is a casted assemblage (part of her Conglomerate series) based on floor molding. This object is formed from different construction materials: concrete, cement, and asphalt. Each material appears in different patches and striations expressing its unique granularities and other differing properties. A square metal rod is embedded into this cast along one of its edges and embedded into another edge is a green scrap that looks leftover from the adjacent weaving.
There are obvious spatial implications to the arrangement of the works; each contains reference to its neighboring pieces that carries viewers around the room. Color choice is important and subtle here. The bright blues, greens, and oranges contrast with the heavy grays of the concrete, the black painted floors, and the white walls of the room. Some of the objects themselves directly are mimetic, taking forms from the room such as the corner or floor mold casting. Gregory’s installation not only complicates the material and spatial relationships of her objects but also challenges the perception of their use. She treats construction materials as textiles, weaving and folding them into one another to create these aggregate assemblages—hybrid objects that form structural systems that defy expected uses and provide a challenge to a dichotomy of hard and soft materials. They also have an indeterminate yet tactile quality to them; the aggregation of materials simultaneously appears sharp, soft, menacing or inviting. In many of these assemblages the heavier objects are supported by the lighter, more fragile ones. This complex layering of materials, textures, and space, and the way Gregory hybridizes the hand-made and found, crafted and cast and her meticulous attention to material choice makes space for provocative encounters.
Resonant City caught up with the artist after seeing the installation and she was asked a few questions, which she answers below
RC: One of the things that we noticed in your work is the interplay between materials. How would you describe the relationships between the materials you choose to work with?
CG: The materials I use are opposites of each other in many respects; formally, their use function, their histories, and processes. I pair materials with their opposite in a gesture to exploit or expose the societal connotation or stereotypes our culture has buried within them. I do this in an effort to push through these stereotypes or to understand them for what they are. Concrete is considered strong and essential, while textiles are often soft, decorative, and additive. I take these common associations and invert them, for example, using lace to support the weight of concrete tube, or building out a Torchon lace pattern in steel to understand the connections between support structure and structures found in the decorative, questioning what is frivolous and what is necessity.
RC: What is your definition of space and what does site play in your work?
CG: I have a background as a weaver, and it is through cloth construction that I understand structure systems in architecture. I have dedicated many years to the study of lace construction. I find the negative space this material contains more important and substantial than the pattern, the thread, or its history. The material serves as a filter or a barrier while eroticizing the other side, calling more attention to the thing it is concealing than were there nothing there at all. It is through this lens that I think about space and architecture. It is not the walls, the boundaries, or the container itself but the presence of the absence, the void or the negative space. The potential energy or the phenomenology that brings the silence or emotion that I am studying.
RC: We noticed that there are many different references in this work, what kinds of research have you been doing that has led up to this installation?
CG: I see my practice as research. I think through ideas by making objects and installations, always asking more questions and never fully committing to an answer or a single truth. This installation has been an accumulation of many years of study. I recently finished my MFA in Fiber and Material Studies at The School of the Art Institute of Chicago, and directly after graduating I took an artist in residence position at the Gerrit Rietveld Academie in Amsterdam. I see The Space Between as my first attempt in unpacking and reconnecting ideas around phenomenological studies of space and place as it relates to architecture and textile. In Chicago I was doing research concerning our cognitive recognition of pattern and how ideas of the decorative are read within culture. Within this study are ideas of utopic architecture and the poetics of Euclidean geometry. In Amsterdam I was fortunate to study closely with the master lace maker Lia Baumeister Jonker who taught me many techniques and oral histories. There I was also was doing a series of interviews with people who utilize objects of translucency as barrier including glass makers and sex workers in Amsterdam’s Red Light District. I don’t expect every person to see all of the research that goes into this work, that is never my goal, but I see the connections between all of these worlds of research and the product. It is ever growing and ever changing.
All images courtesy of the artist
More information can be found on her website
Wong, L. (2002): Home away from
home? Abingdon: Routledge. Seite 171 ↩